Sunday, November 24, 2013

If Dr. Glasser's Ideas Are So Great and Have Been Around for Fifty Years, Why Aren't All Schools Using Them?

A Murray High School Perspective

        Recently, I received an email from a teacher who hopes to convince the administration and staff of her school to move in the direction of creating a Glasser Quality School.  She was asked the question that is the title of this article and she wanted my help to answer it.  Perhaps she sent this to many of the Glasser Quality Schools.  I found this a compelling question and I wanted to share my answer here because we have all given a lot of thought to our goal of teaching the world choice theory and we have often wondered why there aren't more Glasser Quality Schools.  Below is my answer to her question:

            What a great question!  Actually, it has only been 20 years since Dr. Glasser put his ideas together into a form that could help people create an entire school.  He came out with The Quality School and Quality School Teacher in the mid-90's.  Also, this is not a program that can be started in a school at the beginning of a year and then changed a couple of years later.  This is an idea that starts up inside of each participant, from the administration to the teachers, the students, and finally going home to the parents, and home to the teachers' families and the principal's family, too.

            Choice Theory is not a program.  Glasser Quality Schools are not a program.  They are a thought system, a way of life, a new way of thinking about the world, about the relationships between students and teachers, administrators, and families.  It has taken us 26 years to create our current level of mastery of Dr. Glasser's ideas here at Murray.  We still have a long way to go and are involved in making many changes, many improvements.  Dr. Glasser always said that 95% of any problem was a system problem and only 5%, if that much, was a people problem.  So, the job of creating a Glasser Quality School is to come up with a system that works to create happiness in the school.  This is not as easy as it sounds, nor is it as difficult.

            For instance, each of us is learning Choice Theory.  Each of us has our own level of understanding of these ideas and each of us is wrestling with our own level of resistance to these ideas.  We are not all in the same place at the same time, so the system you develop has to have a tolerance and a love for the growth, the individual transformation, that is required.  The system has to have a tolerance for the time it takes for each individual to transform him/herself.

            I can attest to the idyllic environment that is created when you work hard for 26 years to develop a school based on Dr. Glasser's Choice Theory.  We are not all perfect here.  Most of our students have been very hurt by life in so many ways, hurt by the education system that has left too many of them feeling like failures.  We have conflicts every day, but we have a system to understand the conflicts and to work them out.  For instance, when two students became angry at one another on Friday, both of them requested to be able to separate from the other, so no physical conflict would arise.  They walked away.  This is the result of years of work with these two boys to learn Choice Theory, that they can get in charge of the choices they make when anger hits them.  They did not get "in trouble" because they raised their voices at each other and disrupted class.  They got time and attention from trained and loving teachers who heralded their decisions not to hit each other and helped them think through what had happened that led to the conflict, what they each could have done differently, and on Monday, will help them mediate with each other until a plan they can both agree with is in place and a solution to their conflict has begun.

            There is so much to say about the success of this school.  Our test scores soar because our students are happy here and want to do well to help the school, and themselves.  But the best of all is the feeling of camaraderie, of friendship between students and teachers.  Here, there is trust between us.  We work hard at it.  We constantly work to improve our relationships because we know kids won't learn well from people they don't love and who don't love them.  We use the word love all the time here.  We aren't afraid to say we love our kids and they aren't embarrassed to say they love us, too.  We think schools should be built on a foundation of love and trust.

            So, why aren't there thousands of these schools -- good question.  We work all the time to help schools consider adopting these ideas.  Our students travel to schools around the world, teaching people how to start up a Glasser Quality School.  No one is as great a spokesman about Glasser Quality Schools than the kids who are educated here.  Just last week, we hosted a team from a county in North Carolina who had heard about Murray and wanted to see it in action.  Afterwards, they were so overwhelmed by the level of love the kids shared about Murray and the level of understanding they had about why they are being educated the way they are.  They said they want that for their school.  They asked our kids for advice about how to implement these ideas with middle school kids and got lots of suggestions.  They are planning to bring a team of Murray kids to North Carolina to talk to their faculty.

            I think that it takes a long time and a lot of commitment to help an entire staff come to believe that it's possible to create a school based entirely on love and respect.  Next, they need to be willing to transform themselves by learning Choice Theory, Reality Therapy, and Lead Management, in order to bring this about.  For instance, teachers may have become set in their ways and it might be tough for them to give up their "teacher look," the one that nails a kid who is disrupting.  But that look is a threat.  That look has no place in a Glasser Quality School.  So to even give up the looks we've come to rely on, that's asking a lot.  And it takes YEARS of practice, but like anything worth doing, years of practice pay off hugely!  We think our kids deserve an education from a team of professionals who have been practicing for years to treat them respectfully, and to expect great things from them, so they feel inspired to excel.  But I think you can see that the individual transformations that will need to take place for this to happen take time, a personal inclination, and especially, belief.

            When we first started Murray, we all believed we could change schools so kids and teachers would like them more.  At first, however, we brought all our old controlling and punitive behaviors with us and we used them every one of them.  This was good because we got to see that they don't really work, if working means helping resistant students come to love us and to therefore love school and education.  And because we began the school open to changing education in a serious way, we kept tinkering.  We kept developing methods of helping ourselves as staff grow and slough off our old punitive ways and to keep from having a school of chaos with kids running around causing untold trouble.  We learned that kids who love their school don't want to cause trouble and are willing to keep working to unlearn their old habits of acting out and hurting others without thinking.  They are mostly grateful to be learning the skills they can clearly see will help them in their lives, both in and out of school.

            So, if you want to talk more about Glasser Quality Schools, feel free to call me. I LOVE talking about Glasser Quality Schools because I believe that these ideas are so superb that one day all schools will be using them.  Educators would be fools not to use these ideas when they work so well at helping people love school and learning.

Love,
Charlotte Wellen, NBCT, Murray Choices Teacher, Instructor at the William Glasser Institute -- US


Published with permission.

Monday, August 26, 2013

The Loss of Our Teacher and Mentor

Dr Glasser

It is with great sadness that we mourn the loss of our teacher, mentor and friend.  Dr William Glasser MD passed away peacefully in his home in Los Angeles on the 23 August, 2013.

Glasser visited New Zealand on two occasions.  Each time he brought the energy of his teaching as he connected with many throughout the country.  His attendance at the conference in Christchurch was a standout time for those of us who attended.

Gwen Sands and I had dinner with him following that conference, and we will both always have that memory etched in our quality worlds.

I wish to pay tribute to him and what I think is some of what he has taught us.

Dr Glasser - The Lens Maker
The lens through which we view the world is the beliefs we have about how we live our lives.  Are we at the mercy of things and people outside ourselves or do we have control?  This lens impacts on how we interact with others, how we accept what is happening with us and those around us.   If we view the world as ‘doing things’ to us – we can easily slip into the disconnecting habits of blaming and complaining.  Through the lens of internal control psychology we learn that we can make better choices.

Dr Glasser – The Code Breaker
It has been said that we are born without an instruction manual.  Dr Glasser has given us the simple framework of the Basic Needs to understand our driving motivations.  By teaching us this, he has given us the manual for understanding ourselves and others. With this knowledge we can help others take charge of their lives.

Dr Glasser – The Matchmaker
In sharing his theory about the basic needs, we learned about the strengths of the needs.  Knowing your genetic profile or the strengths of you five basic needs and those of someone with whom you are in a relationship, can give valuable information about possible pitfalls. Need strengths profiles that are significantly different can be perceived as a barrier to the relationship, however, awareness of these differences can enable understanding and acceptance.

Dr Glasser – The Peacemaker
The Solving Circle is a very useful way of getting couples on their front wheels and continuing to work hard at their relationship.  Knowing that the only person someone can change is him or herself, this strategy sets up a situation where people within a relationship can see a way forward.  It is useful not only for partners in a relationship but with groups of children in a family or at school. 

Dr Glasser – The Saver of Schools
If all schools were Glasser Quality Schools, we would impact significantly on the world.  Schools where students are self managing, achieving at high standards and are joyful in learning, means that students leave as happier and healthier individuals.  Research shows us that if children are self managing by the age of ten, it impacts on their long term health, wealth and their likelihood of committing crime.  We would need fewer prisons, fewer hospitals and the world would be a safer place for everyone.

Dr Glasser – we thank you from the bottom of our hearts for the learning we have gained because of your work.

We will strive to show a better way to live by continuing to ‘Strengthen New Zealand though Choice Theory Psychology” Choosing, Connecting Change

With Love and Peace
Bette Blance  President William Glasser Institute-New Zealand

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Happy 88th Birthday Dr Glasser

It is fitting that this week , Teacher Appreciation Week , is the 88th birthday of the originator of Choice Theory and its applications Dr William Glasser. 

We have learned from this amazing man through his books, his trainings, his conference presentations and his videos. 
We are so thankful for this knowledge, skills and understandings he has taught us.  The world is a better place for him being here.
We wish you a very happy 88th birthday on May 11 Dr Glasser. 
From Bette Blance and the members of the William Glasser Institute-New  Zealand.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Repeat Offenders



 According to the New Zealand Department of Corrections website, one in every two prisoners is re-convicted and re-imprisoned within four years of release. With a 50% failure rate, is what we are doing working? Anne Tolley, Minister of Corrections wants to reduce this rate by 25%.
        
How about 3.5%  That is the result of a 2012 longitudinal university study in the Californian Institution for Women. These inmates are being taught how they can have control over their lives  by Instructors from the William Glasser Institute.  Over a period of five years 500 women have spent over 100 hours learning Choice Theory.  There is currently a waiting list of 200 women wanting to be involved.  They request transfers from other prisons to be able to learn this life -changing program.

Of the 175 women paroled, only five have returned to prison.  That is 3.5% - a long way better than 25%.

This training is available in New Zealand.  Perhaps we need to look at what it can do for our women in prison.  They are the mothers of children now and in the future.  They can make a difference.

And at the same time we could be teaching students at school Choice Theory to enable them to make choices so they don’t end up in prison in the first place. Everyone is one choice away from prison; let’s teach these young people that they have the choice. 

Strengthen New Zealand through teaching Choice Theory Psychology.  Choosing, Connecting Changing.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Bullied to Death

Watching the recently screened TV program Bullied to Death: The Tragedy of Phoebe Prince, several thoughts came to mind.

This scenario is no doubt played over and over throughout the schools in many countries around the world. New female student arrives at a school, leaving behind friends at a previous school. At first the student is popular, perhaps because of a novelty factor. Then the girl is seen as a competitor with the popular boys of the school. The perpetrators join forces to threaten and punish the victim.

Without intervention this can be an ongoing barrage - deliberate, calculated, purposeful.

Phoebe Prince hung herself, after this ongoing verbal assault over many months became intolerable.

A similar scenario occurred at the school when I was deputy principal. The new eleven year old girl arrived – very attractive and bubbly – and at first was welcomed into the group of popular girls. The friendship and the subsequent behaviour of all of the girls deteriorated, to what could only be called a ‘cat fight’, with physical abuse escalating.

The teacher was unable to resolve the issue and parents became involved.

I used an intervention called the Solving Circle from Dr Glasser’s book Choice Theory, a new psychology for personal freedom.

The long term results of that intervention are documented – years later - relayed to me by the mother of one of the girls. The girls involved in the whole situation at school were still friends. The Solving Circle had lasting impact.

In the TV program there was blaming, criticism and calls for punishment of the bullies and of the education staff. Legislation was introduced involving the mandatory reporting of bullying. Nowhere in the article was there any thought given to the ‘system’ and how a school can be such that students learn to resolve differences.

The obvious cliques in the story, the adversarial relationships are likely indicators that competitive forces are at work. Power-over seemed to be the predominant way of interacting.

Until schools change their ‘system’ to one where issues like this are ‘worked out’, bullying will continue and unhappy students may take the ultimate choice, that of taking their own lives.

Friday, November 23, 2012

Strengthening New Zealand So People Don't Want to Leave


I watched a current affairs program about the New Zealanders going to live in Australia in their thousands over the last five years. The current situation is that New Zealanders arriving in Australia are temporary citizens, not able to access any government money in the form of grants or benefits. That people cannot access unemployment benefits is a good thing, as it is often too easy to become dependent instead of standing on your own two feet.  However, the argument was the children who have gone with their parents to live in Australia since 2003 are unable to access student loans when they wish to study and will need to pay overseas student fees which are significantly higher.
Minister Peter Garrett responded to questions about this situation, stating that New Zealanders were making the choice, knowing this information before they left New Zealand.  He did indicate that there were avenues, government to government that could be undertaken to change this situation. He handled a difficult interview by maintaining his stance that it was an informed choice.
The tweets running underneath the story were interesting.  They used all the disconnecting habits. Understandably, few supported what Peter Garrett was saying.
  #New Zealand should do the same thing to any Australians who come here.  Take away their rights.  Threatening and punishing are deeply entrenched in our society. 
#It’s not fair.  We don’t do it so why should they? Blaming and ‘shoulding’ behaviours,   
One tweet suggested that we strengthen New Zealand so that people did not want to leave the country. What a great idea.  Make New Zealand a needs- satisfying place to be and they will want to stay.
If New Zealand was a place that people wanted to be, what would that be like?  A place where people felt safe; where they had a sense of freedom; where they could be playful and stay connected. Perhaps most people equate a move to Australia with financial success. How can we change the perception of financial success to one of being satisfied with what we already have?  Difficult in a materialistic, celebrity-driven society.
The William Glasser Institute-New Zealand has as its vision statement, Strengthening New Zealand through Choice Theory Psychology. Dr Glasser once told me he believed that New Zealand was a small enough country to have the majority of people knowing, understanding and using Choice Theory.  If they did know, and lived a life where they did not meet their needs at the expense of others, then New Zealand would be a better place to be.  

Monday, August 27, 2012

Central Region meet at Tokoroa


Raewyn Thorne, Regional Coordinator of the William Glasser Institute-New Zealand has sent in this report of a recent meeting held in New Zealand.

Last Thursday a small group of people who had completed a Basic Intensive Week at different times in the last 15 years, met in Tokoroa, part of the Central region with Bette Blance. 

After coffee and nibbles and a catch up chat, Tina-Maree Hooper shared a little of her experiences at the Glasser Conference in Los Angeles in June and some of the ideas she had brought back with her.  

The Choice Theory chart came to life again as Bette walked around it and linked it to our discussions and behaviours. We also reviewed the axioms of Choice Theory. 

Feedback has included "I just learn a little more every time"  and "It's great to have the chance to ask questions in a small group". 

We arranged to meet again in November when another 6 or 7 will have completed their Basic Intensive Training.